Audience.

The internet in itself is an amazing thing in itself. It is a fairly new invention whose potential is still to this day being realized. As if that wasn't already astonishing, in the midst of the rising popularity that is social networks a new feature is revolutionizing the way we are able to access music, by placing more unreachable artists at our very finger tips. I am of course talking about myspace, and it's ever-evolving music interface used by millions daily to see what all the buzz is about, find new and uponcoming artists, and hear what noises are being made right in your very backyard, so to speak.

Controversy.

The significance of this subject is the fact that it (myspace) has the possibility of even further changing the reality that is the way we hear and purchase music in this brave new world that is the digital age. Should myspace realize it's potential, it may someday rival more accurately even overshadow music giant iTunes as the alpha music downloading platform. And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

What I am trying to do is pry open any eyes closed to the invisible threat that myspace poses to the portion of the music industry that makes it's living off of solely cds, ignoring the unharvested market of ringtone hungry, download crazy, and obbsessive music loving junkies that make up the entire world.

More Argument Stuff

More on the argument I had the privilege of witnessing...

My friend's claim: that his brother had been calling his ex, and that wasn't okay. He supported this not just out of suspicion but also by undeniable proof that this was true such as confronting his brother about it and the brother admitting it was true.

His brother's claim: She had been calling him, and he stated that she was to blame for everything. However, he had no proof, other than the usual "he said she said" baseless claims.

My friend's response, and ultimately the way the argument ended: He threatened to hurt his brother if he continued to talk to his ex-girlfriend. And then they hung up the phone.

I would say that my friend won the argument since his brother did not dare to go against what he commanded him to do, or in this case, not to do.

An argument

The last argument I've heard, or the closest thing to one, was overhearing my best friend, who I won't name, arguing with his brother over the phone about recently calling his ex-girlfriend of 5 years. Long story short, there was a threat of physical violence involved and the conversation was over.

Reflection Blog on Multimodal Project

why do you think your assignment is well-suited to a Web reader:

aside from the fact that we were made to post this online, it is because the web is full of more diverse people and ultimately will attract more diverse opinions, good or bad.

what you are proud of:

I am proud of the fact that I had good intentions in attempting to undertake such a hard thing to talk about in our society rather than just critisizing, and try to find fault in everything, I appreciate the fact that I tried to push this generation into a more positive direction, not through my opinion but by the collective conscious of our society, whether or not some of the more adamant voices heard and listened to by the world aren't necessarily the ones of reason.

what you would have done more of had you had more time:

I would have brought to light some of the more obvious facts supporting the idea of an existence of perversion in our society. it's truly one of those things where you don't know where to start because you are simply overwhelmed and surrounded by it.

and what you would have improved on had you had greater technical knowledge:
I would have tried to be more professional in explaining the information, but more importantly I would have tried to make this project everything I originally envisioned it to be. Because it is far from it. Although I myself being my worst critic even know that this was a very challenging topic as opposed to the others and can give myself a little credit I guess.

Additionally, comment on your selection of research:
There was virtually nothing to work with in terms of the information I was looking for. Nevertheless I still settled on what I could find and worked with that.

and any other decisions you think are relevant:
no comment.

this interview is over.

My Podcast.

This is an interview of yours truly, on a paper I am currently writing which is about the invention of the internet and it's contribution to the perversion of society.

http://student.calumet.purdue.edu/~pulidoo1/perversion.MP3

You're welcome.

My proposal.

Yes, I finally proposed. The wedding is going to be in October 2009. (Your invitations in the mail.) Seriously though, in my paper I propose to write about the invention of the internet and it's contribution to the perversion of society. Now I understand that for a few of you this may be a little too much to wrap your little heads around but yes, the internet HAS contributed to the perversion of our society. Some of you might still live in a reality where every woman is still given the benefit of the doubt and cast off as a "morally sound" person, but the fact remains that the embedding of pornography into our day to day lives has psychologically affected us all, to at least some extent, be it a passing thought when dabbling into a person who you just met's love life during a conversation or as extreme to actually partaking in the audience of the millions and millions (if not more) of people around the world who seek out a more for lack of a better word "passionate" (or should I say "kinky") form of entertainment, or dare I say you might even be one of my favorite actresses... Just kidding. But anyways, in my paper I, being the fearless groundbreaking journalist that I am, plan on asking all the questions that keep you up at night but you were always too scared to ask. Some of those questions being: How exactly did this reality come to exist today, How could things have been different, Who is affected most drastically, What lies ahead, Just who exactly is to blame for this, What can we do about this pandemic, How different ARE we than the previous generations given that pornography is more influential now than ever before, and last but not least, the question that's on all your minds, Just how CAN I cash in on the adult entertainment industry? All those questions and more will be answered in my paper, cleverly titled, "The Invention of the Internet and it's Contribution to the Perversion of Society." (Coming soon to a computer near you.)

Hypertext Essay Sources

One of the sources of my hypertext essay was "whatis.com". The reason why I used this website was to gather information on cyberspace. As far as authoritativeness goes, they do specify who it is that wrote the specific piece of information that is posted on the website. For the record also, let me state that this is a website that professionals like IT guys use so it would have to be very reputable by the 'IT' community to be used by them. As far as currency goes, the exact piece of information that I used was written very recently. January 25th, 2008 to be exact. The objectivity seems to be up to standard, to some extent at least since we know all sources of information ever written in the world are somewhat biased. And finally, accuracy. The information is accurate, so much so that the website can be used almost as a dictionary of sorts.

Another source I used was "CNN.com". The authoritativeness is very clear as it does always show who has stated what in it's articles and news stories. The currency is very up to par, in the sense that the website is updated hourly. Accuracy is good, as it is under alot of pressure since it is very much under a microscope, in terms of it's prescence in the rest of the world. And finally objectivity. It's objectivity is somewhat biased but again, since it is under a microscope so to speak, it can only be so biased before it would start to segregate visitors to the site.

The third source I used was "changingminds.org". It's authority is less prominent but nevertheless it does have a section of the website devoted to contacting whoever it is that seems to be in charge. Currency is unknown. Accuracy seems to be okay, so far. And thirdly objectivity is unknown, as since we don't know who wrote the information, we don't know their motives or agenda for saying what they are saying as well.